A definition that is found only on the foundation of the subtexts from which it was built, which equivocally ends up becoming a circular reference. Beautiful? Could Be. Logical? Irrational Question. Misused? Definite Flaw
_______________________________________
Science: Use 'Him' and you have already begun to define. But yes He is a profound inconclusion.God: Or a conclusion that was simply found?
Laymen: Wait does that mean this blog is named after....?
But to define is to pigeon hole language itself, His gift. are we not all at one with our own subjective experiences?
ReplyDeletemind you, a subtext will never explain anything but itself
I do like reverse talk and Randilosophy!
p.s. your both isanse
likeminded friends are few and precious!!
ReplyDeletehaha..wow. agreed!
ReplyDelete