Saturday, April 17, 2010

Odds and (Tr)ends 8.0

quite a common statement this was for the farmers yet a brilliant unravelling to the urban robot....one must question who is living in the past....odds will always controls the trends...

Thursday, April 15, 2010

Odds and (Tr)ends 70% (Whole Numbers to be Used by Fads)

And as it found itself within and realized the irony of what had occurred, a diversion was needed:

"its not all about self indulgence and market share - odds are there are more fruitful applications!" declared the iPod to the village of farmers.


Odds and (Tr)ends 6.0 (% only to be used with Odds)

these special folks are few and far between, their standards deviate from the norm and they mingle in the long tail yet blast the greatest impacts

hence the rule of scarcity and value

Odds and (Tr)ends 50%

And the ones that truly stand apart with purpose but no arrogance are the ones with the strongest ability to create the noise.

As the perplexed from within look out, they mimic their paths in their own silent (almost microscopic) ways.... for all brilliance is inherently appreciated. The fresh inquisitive eyes from out far smile as they never wander beyond the invisible.

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

Odds and (Tr)ends 4.0

the intrigue of trend
can spell your end

let's think about the odds of being the statistic, the one everyone thought was a little odd....

chew on this my friends

Monday, April 12, 2010

Odds and (Tr)ends 30%


Stop Go I Don't Know


The odds scare you away but the trends invite you back in.
Reverse flow does impact within.

Sunday, April 11, 2010

Odds and (Tr)ends 2.0


bells and whistles
curves and thistles
married go round
where will it land?

Saturday, April 10, 2010

Odds and (Tr)ends 1.0

  1. 9 out of 10 Attempts FAIL
  2. 73% believe they know everything
  3. Those who want more are charted on an upstairs staircase
  4. Curious tendencies have lost 120 basis points
  5. We are 100% trending towards oblivion
  6. We are on to the numbers (majority rules)
  7. The numbers are on to us (minority rules)
  8. Trends say all current odds have 50/50 accuracy

God vs. Science 10:9

10:9 The Parable That Confounds

.......and the silence washed over us as the doubt set in along side the overarching angles of hope.

The roars of our decided inconclusions grew as they realized the impact on future generations that haven't yet found their letter in the alphabet.

Thursday, April 8, 2010

God vs. Science 10.5

whether it be the pigeons' designs in nature, the mouses' well-tread path to its dug up home or the catipillar's close minded cacoon...we each must blaze trails of belief that satisfy our own self-decided fundamental truths

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

God vs Science 10.0

A putty a piece to do with at will.

10.0 Commandments and 10.0 Theorems on the way to mingle with mixers of thought and creation.

(Wanton extravagant holes created by pigeons shed a tear.)

Tuesday, April 6, 2010

God vs. Science 9.0

the screenplay of life is fraught with questions
no matter the speaker or the writer
our realities and the creators of our realities are 
characters, 
figments, 
delights of our own fancy

Monday, April 5, 2010

God vs. Science 0.0


And on the first day He created: ~Ambiguity~

Why aren't we OK not knowing?

Sunday, April 4, 2010

God vs. Science 8.0

...a debatable states of affairs we are intertwined with - a playground for the curious...

Enter in the subject(ives) and usher out the object(ives) {after the BIG BANG of course}. But as the state crumbles under own accounts and hard coded numbers of Pi..the subjects could very well see a silver peaceful night reflected in the pearly gates (Before or after waking up)


Saturday, April 3, 2010

God vs. Science 7.0

HE is only 1 of many profound inconclusions in this existance, some are man made others...mysteriously made...

Thursday, April 1, 2010

God with Science 6.0

A definition that is found only on the foundation of the subtexts from which it was built, which equivocally ends up becoming a circular reference. Beautiful? Could Be. Logical? Irrational Question. Misused? Definite Flaw

_______________________________________
Science: Use 'Him' and you have already begun to define. But yes He is a profound inconclusion.
God: Or a conclusion that was simply found?
Laymen: Wait does that mean this blog is named after....?