God vs Science 10.0

A putty a piece to do with at will.

10.0 Commandments and 10.0 Theorems on the way to mingle with mixers of thought and creation.

(Wanton extravagant holes created by pigeons shed a tear.)

God vs. Science 9.0

the screenplay of life is fraught with questions

no matter the speaker or the writer

our realities and the creators of our realities are 

characters, 

figments, 

delights of our own fancy

God vs. Science 0.0

And on the first day He created: ~Ambiguity~

Why aren't we OK not knowing?

God vs. Science 8.0

...a debatable states of affairs we are intertwined with - a playground for the curious...

Enter in the subject(ives) and usher out the object(ives) {after the BIG BANG of course}. But as the state crumbles under own accounts and hard coded numbers of Pi..the subjects could very well see a silver peaceful night reflected in the pearly gates (Before or after waking up)

God vs. Science 7.0

HE is only 1 of many profound inconclusions in this existance, some are man made others...mysteriously made...

God with Science 6.0

A definition that is found only on the foundation of the subtexts from which it was built, which equivocally ends up becoming a circular reference. Beautiful? Could Be. Logical? Irrational Question. Misused? Definite Flaw

_______________________________________

Science: Use 'Him' and you have already begun to define. But yes He is a profound inconclusion.

God: Or a conclusion that was simply found?

Laymen: Wait does that mean this blog is named after....?

God vs. Science 5.0

how fetching a response yet highly unsatisfactory...isn't that the way of those who attempt to define Him?

God vs. Science Round 4.0

God: "I would like to feel ...but the mechanisms are all wrong."

Science: "God (dammit)! I am 50% sure you mixed up our quotes again..."

God vs. Science 3.0

 Nothing short of human limitations for brain capacity and stress packed to-do's have resulted in this hiccup of thought...Lo Siento.

Back to the task at hand....and it will be short:

The only difference between humans and robots is questions.

God vs. Science 2.0

Wonder and amazement alongside binary theories of plausible data. Both so intertwined yet so divergent...

Explaining what we can and filling what we can't with whatever make us feel good. (Those leftover gaps always bothered the puzzlemakers)

We seem intent to account for all the answers but who is serving up the needed questions?